My midwife just called. She has the results of the ultrasound I had done this morning. Everything looks fine, except...
...except, they estimate my due date to be two weeks earlier than the date given based on the first day of my last period.
This might be because I, well, um, didn't really tell them the real first day of my last period. After my first three pregnancies where the babies all came late and doctors were threatening inducing me (Katie, in fact, was induced, but there are other reasons for that), I was fed up with arguing, tired of going "against medical advice," and pretty ticked off at doctors who basically said that they knew better because they were doctors and my own personal experience with my own body and pregnancies wasn't worth as much as their degrees.
Fritz came 10 days "late" and my due date was moved later after an early ultrasound. Billy came 11 days "late" and this due date was moved later because I had had one negative pregnancy test. Based on the first day of my last period, these guys would have been about 2 1/2 weeks "late". The doctor refused to push my due date later with Katie because the ultrasound only indicated a later date of 6 days, not 7. She was induced 10 days "late" - more like a week early based on my prior experience, but you can't argue with those degrees.
Since I'm moving, this midwife is passing the buck to the midwife in Kansas. I'll see what she wants to do about this "problem." I'm insisting that my last cycle was normal, and my dates are right. My kids have all been healthy with no signs of being in the womb too long. I know my cycles are longer than "normal" and I know I ovulate later than most. I predicted Jenny's due date exactly right, and I was 4 days off for Pete. I just don't want a battle royale in October.